<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PubCon Vegas 2006 - Duplicate Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jazzcatseo.com/pubcon-vegas-2006-duplicate-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jazzcatseo.com/pubcon-vegas-2006-duplicate-content/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Sound Of Traffic</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian White</title>
		<link>http://jazzcatseo.com/pubcon-vegas-2006-duplicate-content/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzcatseo.com/pubcon-vegas-2006-duplicate-content/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Jazzcat,

Thanks for the writeup--I wanted to urge people not to think of our duplicate content resolution as a penalty.  We're not out to penalize people for general duplicate content (unless you flat out scrape it).  We're simply desiring to represent one document.  For example, we're not interested in "penalizing" the online version of an offline newspaper simply because they syndicate and serve newswire stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jazzcat,</p>
<p>Thanks for the writeup&#8211;I wanted to urge people not to think of our duplicate content resolution as a penalty.  We&#8217;re not out to penalize people for general duplicate content (unless you flat out scrape it).  We&#8217;re simply desiring to represent one document.  For example, we&#8217;re not interested in &#8220;penalizing&#8221; the online version of an offline newspaper simply because they syndicate and serve newswire stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
